Comparison · honest
crawlwise vs Screaming Frog SEO Spider
The desktop crawler most technical SEOs already have open.
What it is
A Java desktop application that crawls a whole site from your own machine, with a paid licence that removes the 500-URL cap.
Where Screaming Frog SEO Spider is better
This section is the reason to read the page. A comparison that only lists our wins is marketing, and you would know it was.
- It crawls an entire site. We audit one page and probe a bounded set of URLs around it, and a 50,000-page e-commerce catalogue is not something this product can do today.
- It renders JavaScript with an embedded Chromium. Our checks read the HTML the server returns, so a client-rendered page looks thin to us and fine to it.
- It has a log file analyser, custom extraction with XPath and CSS selectors, a visual sitemap, scheduled crawls and a config file per client. We have none of that.
- It is a one-off licence with no per-use cost, so crawling a large site repeatedly costs nothing extra.
Where we differ
- It runs on your machine and stores nothing for you. Two audits six weeks apart are two CSVs unless you keep them yourself; our monitoring keeps the history and tells you what changed.
- It reports what it found. We answer whether GPTBot, ClaudeBot and Google-Extended can actually reach the page — by fetching it as each of them — which no crawler does.
- Its issue list is mechanical. Ours is grouped into things to fix, things worth considering with a real opt-out, and things that were not measured.
- You have to be at your desk. This runs from a URL.
What cannot be compared
- A free desktop tool with no account against a hosted service with a credit balance.
Judge it yourself without paying either of us
Run the free seo + generative search checklist on your own site — no account, no credit, no email. Then audit one page, which the trial credit covers, and read the limits page to see what it will not tell you before you spend anything.